Tuesday, June 19, 2012

Two Men Don't Make an Argument

Quite frankly, I think they're both wrong.  Any time you decide that you're opinion swings to the extreme of any spectrum, it seems almost inevitable that you're really just going to make yourself look silly.  And while one of our authors (Carr) thinks that excessive internet usage is going to cause this:
http://www.jonathanrosenbaum.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/the-day-after-tomorrow.jpg
and the other (Shirky) seems to think that mastering the detailed facets of the World Wide Web is the precursor to this:
http://emergingyouth.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/led20zeppelin20stairway20to20heaven.jpg
the reality is this:



Young adults sit around with juice boxes and kittens and look at pictures of...well...kittens.  

Both authors are partially correct.  The increased use of the internet in our world today has fundamentally altered the ways in which we operate.  However, neither of them had it quite right.  While Carr took the negative approach and decided that (about halfway down the eleventybillion lines of text) it is in the "economic interest [of companies] to drive us to distraction."  Based on this, he has decided that since we are now distracted, we are useless.  Or at least, we will be.

On the other hand, Shirky has decided that since the newly formed Intertube resources have given today's youth (doomed though we may be, in Carr's world) the outlet that we need to become the truly upstanding citizens it'll take to save humanity from itself.  While each new wave of technology in the past has done nothing short of exacerbate the dirty little nooks of the world it came into (Scat porn, anybody?) this wave will be different.  This wave will give us freedom.  It'll give us a new life.  It'll change everything.

Except it won't.  They're wrong.  The incoming information we deal with on the internet is, in fact, different from anything that's happened before, it's not going to turn us into a generation of concentration-deficient robots.  Also, the accessibility of blogging sites isn't going to form a massive influx of Hemingways and Prousts.  

Instead, it's going to serve multiple moderate purposes.  It will make it easier to write for those of us who wish to do so.  It will make it easy to access information quickly, in snippets that are easily digested.  And finally, it will become a part of our lives that is so innate and reflexive that we will have adapted to these things, and they'll fall into our patterns of behavior where we need them.

4 comments:

  1. HAHA! I love your pictures. I like that your use of pictures say and explain more than what words could have done. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Haha this is awesome. I think it was great that you didn't agree with either because they are at the polar ends of the spectrum and those extremes are rarely ever right. Your title was very witty and I loved your use of images to tell the story - very effective :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love the humor you put in your posts. You make an intelligent argument, yet still make it fun and humorous to read, especially with the pictures. You've got this blogging thing down!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have to say that I agree with Kaylee. Words cannot give a better explanation than your pictures in this post. Not to mention it is a great way to incorporate other modes of communication into a well thought-out opinion.

    ReplyDelete